Skip to content

Visibility Report

Read the report before you run one.

Example figures using the same checkers every user gets. Not a live audit of this site.

By · Last updated:

01 / Decision brief

What should you fix first?

This example shows a workable foundation with answer-readiness as the clearest next fix. Start with the findings, not the score, and turn each directional signal into a practical action.

Coverage46 of 46 checks evaluated
Results22 passed · 17 warned · 7 failed
Work22 actions covering 24 open findings
02 / Scorecard

What does the report measure?

Scores are directional checks, not forecasts of rankings, traffic, or citations.

SEO
82/100

Grade B · 11 passed · 1 failed · 6 warned

18 on-page visibility checks: title tags, meta descriptions, headings, canonical and robots directives, snippet eligibility, internal links, and content freshness.

GEO
53/100

Grade D · 5 passed · 3 failed · 3 warned

11 AI-search readiness checks: answer blocks, question headings, fact density, entity mentions, author attribution, and citations. Structured data is reported as optional context, not an AI requirement.

AEO Readiness — Beta
63/100

Grade D · 6 passed · 3 failed · 8 warned

17 answer-readiness checks: visible Q&A content, question headings, direct answer blocks, fact density, freshness, and source references. Beta scores are still being calibrated and do not predict citations, rankings, inclusion, or traffic.

Crawler access is reviewed separately from these three scores and is not part of the overall result.

03 / The record

What evidence was captured?

Every report carries its own provenance, so a reader can tell what was analysed and when.

Captured with the same engine every user gets
Requested URLhttps://example.com
Analyzed URLhttps://example.com
Analysis statuscompleted
Contract version1.1
Page contextunknown (none confidence)
Generated at2026-09-09T00:00:00.000000+00:00

Page type could not be determined with confidence from the available evidence; all checks are shown unfiltered.

04 / Findings

What deserves attention

Showing the first 4 of 24 open findings. Each carries its own evidence.

OPTIMUS / VISIBILITY FINDINGAEO Readiness — Beta · Highest impact
Failed

Question Headings

No question-phrased headings or questions in body text found

Question-form headings mirror the queries people and answer engines use.

01 / What we foundNo question-phrased headings or questions in body text found02 / Recommended action

Where natural, phrase H2/H3s as questions users ask ('What is...', 'How does...'). Question pairing is an Optimus heuristic, not a documented Google requirement.

Directional review. Inspect the condition on the page, implement, then re-run to confirm the change.
OPTIMUS / VISIBILITY FINDINGGEO · Highest impact
Warning

Answer Blocks

Only 10 answer block(s) / 0 question heading(s); answer quality below target (avg 44).

Self-contained answer paragraphs are easier for answer engines to extract and attribute.

01 / What we foundOnly 10 answer block(s) / 0 question heading(s); answer quality below target (avg 44).02 / Recommended action

Add direct answer blocks (40-160 words) directly under each question H2/H3, opening with the answer and including concrete evidence. This is an Optimus heuristic from AEO/GEO research; Google does not require content chunking.

Directional review. Inspect the condition on the page, implement, then re-run to confirm the change.
OPTIMUS / VISIBILITY FINDINGAEO Readiness — Beta · Highest impact
Warning

Answer Blocks

Only 10 answer block(s) / 0 question heading(s); answer quality is below target (avg 44).

Self-contained answer paragraphs are easier for answer engines to extract and attribute.

01 / What we foundOnly 10 answer block(s) / 0 question heading(s); answer quality is below target (avg 44).02 / Recommended action

Add direct answer blocks (40-160 words) directly under each question H2/H3, opening with the answer and including concrete evidence. This is an Optimus heuristic from AEO/GEO research; Google does not require content chunking.

Directional review. Inspect the condition on the page, implement, then re-run to confirm the change.
OPTIMUS / VISIBILITY FINDINGAEO Readiness — Beta · Highest impact
Warning

FAQ Content

No visible FAQ content found. Visible question-and-answer content can help readers and answer engines; this is an Optimus heuristic opportunity, not a documented Google requirement.

Visible question-and-answer content is the usable signal for readers and answer engines. Google discontinued FAQ rich results for all sites in May 2026, so FAQPage markup itself earns no Google visibility credit.

01 / What we foundNo visible FAQ content found. Visible question-and-answer content can help readers and answer engines; this is an Optimus heuristic opportunity, not a documented Google requirement.02 / Recommended action

Consider adding a visible FAQ section with real questions your readers ask. FAQPage schema is optional and earns no Google rich-result benefit (discontinued May 2026).

Directional review. Inspect the condition on the page, implement, then re-run to confirm the change.
05 / Validated signals

What already passed?

22 checks passed. A report that only lists problems is not a report.

SEO — HTTPSSEO — Mobile ViewportSEO — Robots MetaSEO — Snippet EligibilityAEO Readiness — Beta — AI Bot AccessSEO — Internal LinksGEO — Fact DensityAEO Readiness — Beta — Entity Mentions

Showing 8 of 22 passed checks.

Example only. Run a fresh diagnostic for inspected results — a real audit verifies the condition on the page before it reports it.

SEO scores are calculated from 18 on-page checks; GEO from 11 AI Overview readiness checks; AEO Readiness - Beta from 17 answer-readiness checks. Beta scores are still being calibrated and do not predict AI citations, rankings, inclusion, or traffic. Scores shown here are example figures, not a live audit, and may change as content or algorithms evolve.

Sources: public documentation

View the methodology